by John Galt » Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:02 pm
i don't think philly is saying that
Philly was noting how Clinton is blaming random americans and shitting on them in a book explaining why everyone else is the cause of her failure
the fact that she feels compelled to write a book about it is because she thinks its not her fault at all
and what does it do? it certainly doesn't help the democratic party. she's a loser and a really sore one at that. had donald done this you'd be saying that he was a sore loser. of course, the republicans would have used the opportunity to distance themselves from him if he lost. but of course he didn't lose because hillary managed to do that. and democrats would do well to distance from her.
the democratic party needs a message to put out to voters. and sander's message is strong. having the loser from the last election complaining that he was part of the reason why she lost is not helpful at all, it's the exact opposite of that
she's a bitter, bitter woman, who feels like the whole world owes her because of what she had to go through with her narcissistic serial adulterer and accused rapist of a husband, and she's just so angry at the whole world about it. but really lady, bill is the one who hurt you. also, you're pretty much a flower of paradise and should get over yourself. being bitter and angry at some woman who didn't vote for you is ridiculous. maybe if you didn't come off as the kind of person that made you think "huh, maybe alex jones is right about lizard people?" people would have voted for you
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.