Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Current news and it's political impact.

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby exploited » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:23 pm

The Comrade wrote:
exploited wrote:Yes, he was bombing cities. Bombing whole cities suggests a much larger scale thing, i.e. carpet bombing. At that time, the war wasn't that large and the destruction wasn't even close to the link you just posted.

Next.


have you seen aleppo? homs? half the small cities in syria? most of them look like dresden or berlin in 1945.

you're way out of your depth here and no amount of semantics are going to save you.


"Isn't" and "won't"

I thought you said you understood the distinction?

Also, are you aware that tanks and artillery are also used in this war? I can't be sure because your thinking is always so sloppy.
User avatar
exploited
Vice President
 
Posts: 20827
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 2158 times
Been thanked: 1684 times

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby exploited » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:26 pm

The Comrade wrote:
exploited wrote:
The Comrade wrote:
exploited wrote:
I suppose you've forgotten that the proxy war between Russia and the US in Afghanistan started with anti-aircraft weapons, and as losses started accumulating, the war expanded dramatically, to the point that the CIA was spending billions of dollars to arm the resistance. They even trained them through Pakistan's security services.


This is where I predict conflict expansion along proxy war lines.

not sure if you're aware but terrorist motivation isn't a health bar that gets filled up by a set amount of actions. they're already as angry at us as they're going to be in order to motivate terrorism. we crossed that rubicon ages ago. you think not getting involved in syria will change anything? talk about naivete. and i'm not sure why you think i want to support the rebels? more dumbass assuming on your part?


This is where Comrade starts pretending he doesn't want to support the rebels and I laugh at him for being full of shit.


i didn't want to support them back then. i wanted an actual US military intervention.

stay losing, ex.


:))

Yeah that's a winning strategy right there.


moving the goal posts i see.

but yes, it is. it worked in libya.

"HUR DUR LIBYA IS A FAILED STATE!!!"

the consolidation of libya by the legitimate armed forces and the rebels was only halted due to the presence of ISIS. work on that front has taken priority for the time being. you'll see when libya pulls itself back together.


Lol hilarious and deluded.
User avatar
exploited
Vice President
 
Posts: 20827
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 2158 times
Been thanked: 1684 times

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby The Comrade » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:29 pm

exploited wrote:
The Comrade wrote:
exploited wrote:Potentially sparking a conflict means I said WW3 was gonna happen definitively as a result? More Comrade Comprehension issues lol.

And, yeah, of course Russia was sending AA weaponry to dissuade US or Israeli military intervention. Are you denying that?



no but you were the one saying russian AA was going to shoot down american and israeli planes, or rather implying it, and spark a wider conflict.

you got egg on your face. just admit it and move and most importantly stay losing B-)


Seriously, you can't read. Its sad. What I said is that the US invading Syria directly would result in a proxy war between Russia and the US. Which is absolutely true. Russian AA would be used against American jets, just like Russia bombers are being used against American allies.

Honestly, this is sad dude.


lol that's not what you said. just own up to it dude. it's okay. B-)
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
The Comrade
Vice President
 
Posts: 18068
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Yugoslavia
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 1824 times
Political Leaning: Socialist

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby The Comrade » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:30 pm

exploited wrote:Lol hilarious and deluded.



provide some counter evidence that isn't some shitty op-ed then B-)
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
The Comrade
Vice President
 
Posts: 18068
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Yugoslavia
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 1824 times
Political Leaning: Socialist

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby The Comrade » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:31 pm

exploited wrote:
The Comrade wrote:
exploited wrote:Yes, he was bombing cities. Bombing whole cities suggests a much larger scale thing, i.e. carpet bombing. At that time, the war wasn't that large and the destruction wasn't even close to the link you just posted.

Next.


have you seen aleppo? homs? half the small cities in syria? most of them look like dresden or berlin in 1945.

you're way out of your depth here and no amount of semantics are going to save you.


"Isn't" and "won't"

I thought you said you understood the distinction?

Also, are you aware that tanks and artillery are also used in this war? I can't be sure because your thinking is always so sloppy.


but isn't and won't doesn't matter when he was literally doing it before you even made that initial comment. that's why it's irrelevant. you were wrong then and you're wrong now.

and yeah artillery and tanks are used. tanks aren't very destructive to buildings on a mass scale and artillery is assad's thing for the most part. so, again, assad is leveling his cities. you can literally view it in real time. just move on little breh :ymsmug:
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
The Comrade
Vice President
 
Posts: 18068
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Yugoslavia
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 1824 times
Political Leaning: Socialist

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby exploited » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:34 pm

:))

Still doesn't understand the isn't and won't distinction.

I'd be glad to move on if you'd stop making shitty policy suggestions and thinking they are non-shitty.
User avatar
exploited
Vice President
 
Posts: 20827
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 2158 times
Been thanked: 1684 times

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby The Comrade » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:42 pm

exploited wrote::))

Still doesn't understand the isn't and won't distinction.

I'd be glad to move on if you'd stop making shitty policy suggestions and thinking they are non-shitty.


okay but you said he "isn't" leveling cities, not that he won't, correct?
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
The Comrade
Vice President
 
Posts: 18068
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Yugoslavia
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 1824 times
Political Leaning: Socialist

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby exploited » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:50 pm

The Comrade wrote:
exploited wrote::))

Still doesn't understand the isn't and won't distinction.

I'd be glad to move on if you'd stop making shitty policy suggestions and thinking they are non-shitty.


okay but you said he "isn't" leveling cities, not that he won't, correct?


Yes.

This is where you post about Homs and Aleppo and forget about the other 22 cities (and even then you'll be talking about stuff that happened after July 2013, and of course all the ordinance shot was by Assad's aircraft, and none of it was caused by rebel artillery lol). Typical sloppy Comrade thinking. The US government must have leveled every city in Iraq - look at what they did to Fallujah!
User avatar
exploited
Vice President
 
Posts: 20827
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 2158 times
Been thanked: 1684 times

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby The Comrade » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:56 pm

exploited wrote:
The Comrade wrote:
exploited wrote::))

Still doesn't understand the isn't and won't distinction.

I'd be glad to move on if you'd stop making shitty policy suggestions and thinking they are non-shitty.


okay but you said he "isn't" leveling cities, not that he won't, correct?


Yes.


and i'm saying that it doesn't matter, because he was leveling cities before we even had that argument. so the distinction is irrelevant. you were wrong when you posted it i just forgot to call you out on it.


B-)
ImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
The Comrade
Vice President
 
Posts: 18068
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Yugoslavia
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 1824 times
Political Leaning: Socialist

Re: Russia Started Bombing Anti-Assad Rebels

Postby exploited » Sat Oct 24, 2015 3:08 pm

The Comrade wrote:
exploited wrote:
The Comrade wrote:
exploited wrote::))

Still doesn't understand the isn't and won't distinction.

I'd be glad to move on if you'd stop making shitty policy suggestions and thinking they are non-shitty.


okay but you said he "isn't" leveling cities, not that he won't, correct?


Yes.


and i'm saying that it doesn't matter, because he was leveling cities before we even had that argument. so the distinction is irrelevant. you were wrong when you posted it i just forgot to call you out on it.


B-)


Which cities?

What percentage can be attributed to aircraft?

What percentage of destruction occured prior to July 2013?

Show your work.
User avatar
exploited
Vice President
 
Posts: 20827
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 2158 times
Been thanked: 1684 times

PreviousNext

Post a reply

Quote Selected
 

Return to Front Page News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron