SCOTUS Strikes Down Section 4 of VRA

[Darkhorse]

[The Dude]

Yeah, that didn't address what you said at all.

"Not the kind of violations that the law required for the federal government to have oversight."

You haven't quoted the part where those violations are not enough for the oversight. I'll keep waiting.

[Darkhorse]

[The Dude]

You've just re-quoted something that doesn't address the issue. Perhaps you didn't even understand what you originally said.

I continue to wait an adequate quoting that asserts "Not the kind of violations that the law required for the federal government to have oversight"

[Darkhorse]

[The Dude]

I'm still waiting...

[Darkhorse]

[The Dude]

resorting to insults. typical.

[Darkhorse]

Just adding insult to injury. I've very clearly responded to your question already. Your refusal to acknowledge that I have or explain how I haven't is just another moronic debate tactic. You're trying to give the impression that I'm intentionally dodging your question because you know you can't beat me in an actual debate.

Too easy.

[The Dude]

you said you were leaving the debate long go, then re-entered and couldn't back up your claim. Poor chap.