Political Crossfire Forums

Sorry, what were those reasons?

You've asserted that there exists a small chance Hamad will destroy Israel, and Hamas is committed to continuing to try to destroy Israel, therefor Hamas will eventually succeed, therefore Hamas poses an existential threat.

Me and my golden retrievers have a small chance of success, and we will keep trying, and therefore we will eventually succeed (according to your moronic logic) and therefore we pose an existential threat to China (by your moronic logic).

You presuppose I will be unable to recruit. Given my powers of persuasion and adorable golden retriever companions I believe I could recruit an excellent gang of cohorts in no time at all.

Also I may be immortal. There is some chance that in the future we will develope a method to make humans immortal, and there is some chance I will be able to pay for this treatment. Indeed, I would argue the chance of me becomin immortal is much higher than the likelihood of Hamas destroying Israel with some crappy rockets.

I would be willing to sew the little doggy suicide vests. So now there are two terrorist existential threats lulz

And who says I have zero percent chance of succeeding in my lifetime? Who knows. Ameriman postulates that if Israel chose not to respond to Hamad more and more people would fire rockets, and eventually render Israel uninhabitable.

In my scenario maybe China won't respond and pretty soon there are Goldens retriever bomb dogs trotting in from every bordering nation and being doggy-parachuted in. If china didn't respond it could become uninhabitable in no time at all.

Thus I do indeed have just as good a chance of succes as to china as Hamas does to Israel.

Therefore, existential threat. By Americans logic.

Exploited isn't a lawyer. He will carry on after I die.

What is dead may never die. Never forget.

Sigh. Existentialism means unicorn. We have gone over this already.