Re: Which is better: legal discretion or automatic enforceme
Posted:
Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:26 pmby eynon81
it's not totally impractical. We'd have to increase the number of judges/DAs/PubDefs/andJuries by about 10 fold though.
Saz still speaks for me. You're doing great.
Re: Which is better: legal discretion or automatic enforceme
Posted:
Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:40 pmby exploited
The police make the decision. When there is reasonable evidence to support the contention that the law is broken, they should arrest the responsible party and try them. You know, sort of like how it is specifically designed to work?
They should not be allowed to simply not charge just because. That isn't democracy, it isn't legitimacy, it is basic corruption.
Re: Which is better: legal discretion or automatic enforceme
Posted:
Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:44 pmby spacemonkey
Just think, they could invent a car that knows where it is and the speed limit there. If you exceed that, your car turns you in.
Re: Which is better: legal discretion or automatic enforceme
Posted:
Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:48 pmby exploited
Not at all. You are pointing out how discretion fails and then using it as proof that discretion is preferable. Honestly one of the most retarded arguments ever made.