GOP Economics Proven WRONG AGAIN

[Professor]

[The Dude]

[Charai]

[The Dude]

[Professor]

[Professor]

[Charai]

[The Dharma Bum]

The idea behind the statistic represented by the "Laffer curve" is that there is a point where revenue input can be maximized and beyond which higher taxation is counterproductive or irrelevant.

Not sure why you think that point doesn't exist. It may not have been represented rightfully by the so-called conservative wing of US politics, but there is a point where revenue and productivity can both be maximized.

[Charai]

[The Dharma Bum]

If you tax at 100% you will not take in more revenue because there will be nothing left to tax after the first go round, all of those business will fail. You even point this out yourself in your argument, although you characterize it as "slowing growth".

There is a point in any given situation where both revenue and productivity are maximized and no one ever said anything about it being a static value. Clearly you understand this fact, but are trying to explain it away for some reason.

Want to see massive economic growth? Eliminate the state and collectivize production and distribution. You eliminate the to biggest barriers to a healthy economy and community in one fell swoop.