Political Crossfire Forums

There is better evidence that he got away than that he didn't, that is the point that escapes you.

The only real evidence that showed he died in his bunker was subjected to DNA analysis and was shown to actually belong to a 40 year old woman. So that was fabricated evidence. There's that and the reports of a few accomplices versus expert testimony in a classified US document.

Again you are giving credibility to a 'US document' and US experts and US Fed agents to further your opinion in this thread..

Kind of weird..

And again and I promise for the last time... You aren't even trying to answer my question:

Why? What did anyone have to gain..

You're being vague.

If you think there was a real possibility he escaped and was being protected you got to have a solid opinion on who and why.. Not just saying 'lots of people'...

Just checked into the various claims made by Dharma.

He was not observed by two FBI agents. Two FBI agents wrote a report that detailed claims made by others, but there was no actual observation on their part.

The evidence that he came aboard a submarine and lived in the Andean foothills was made by an unrevealed source, but he claimed to be working with six top Argentinian officials, so this source was most certainly not an FBI agent.

Dharma is so full of bullshit my nose stings. Unbelievable amounts of lies, distortion and outright fabrication on his part.