Re: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted:
Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:55 am
by PoS
If youre gonna go by that argument then Hitler didnt want war until 1944 as well.
Re: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted:
Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:39 am
by Stratego
I think the superiority and threat of the nuclear bomb was over-hyped. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were equivalent to about 35 Kilotons of damage. Those were considered big ass bombs at the time, but the actual damage is less than 1% of the damage that was done by conventional bombs.
Re: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted:
Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:32 am
by The Dharma Bum
still enough to wipe out a city