Re: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:55 amIf youre gonna go by that argument then Hitler didnt want war until 1944 as well.
Political Crossfire Forums
Political forum discussions also covering current events, constitutional rights, and more!
https://political-crossfire.com/
Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Page 5 of 7
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:55 amRe: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:02 pmRe: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 5:57 pmRe: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 1:40 amRe: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 3:22 amRe: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:14 amRe: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 pmRe: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:58 pmNo, you!
Re: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:39 amI think the superiority and threat of the nuclear bomb was over-hyped. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were equivalent to about 35 Kilotons of damage. Those were considered big ass bombs at the time, but the actual damage is less than 1% of the damage that was done by conventional bombs.
Re: Should we have attacked China head on in the Korean War?
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:32 amstill enough to wipe out a city