Dear America. Sincerely, Einstein

[spacemonkey]

The only thing that gives different results for doing the same thing is twisting a kaleidoscope. It sure don't work for re electing lifer politicians, as we are about to do.

[John Galt]

[Philly]

[John Galt]

[NAB]

[John Galt]

[NAB]

[John Galt]

I'm old enough to remember as well, nab. And the thing is, she was claimed to be influential and she tried to be, but she failed. Instead...

She wore a blueberry beret

Hillary instead was a source of support for Bill rather than influential in her own right. She's better now than what she was; she was unhinged and now she's chillingly calculating. But I'd rather have that than Trump, who is completely incapable of reasoned discussion about anything. However, this isn't part of her resume. She learned from the experience that she couldn't just get what she wanted, true. In a lot of ways she acted then like Trump does now. But lots of people have plenty of experience that is better suited: She has never held executive power

[NAB]

[spacemonkey]

If she does win, it will be interesting to see if she gets security clearance after fiasco with classified e mail . My guess = special Clinton rules will have to be applied. The scary part is how many are ok with endorsing a known corrupt liar. This is how we will be viewed by the world now >>>>>> .