Page 2 of 5
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:05 pm
by John Galt
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:07 pm
by exploited
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:45 pm
by jimmyz
Nope. They felt nothing at all. Just lumps of cells not worthy of the most basic human rights. Rights like not having to be butchered inside and partially outside the womb. Abortion is immoral and pro-abortionists are vile.
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:48 pm
by jimmyz
The middle baby felt the scalpel every bit as much as the journalist hostage felt the ISIS knife beheading him.
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:50 pm
by Philly
Your right to life is predicated on your ability to survive. Your viability. If sustained life is not viable without acting as a parasite to another human being (literally living off of them, inside of them), you only have a right to life should that person decide they want to continue sustaining you.
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:53 pm
by jimmyz
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:54 pm
by Philly
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:00 pm
by jimmyz
Yes. Look at the size and term of all but one of those pics of the murdered babies. Even ones smaller and earlier in term than them have survived.
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:06 pm
by exploited
I'd say that two trimesters is enough time to decide whether or not to get an abortion. Past that, I think there is a certain obligation to recognize that the fetus has developed enough to warrant protections.
Re: USSC tells Texas "Not in my house, no no no!"
Posted:
Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:09 pm
by Philly