When Birtherism Boomerangs

The place for general political discussion.

Re: When Birtherism Boomerangs

Postby The dane » Fri Aug 30, 2013 5:50 am

There are basically three types of Birthers.

Type 1. Racists

Type 2. Republican partisans

Type 3. Strict constitutionalists

Of which the first two types are by far the most common, and they do not care about where Cruz was born, because he's a Republican who looks mostly white.

The third much smaller group might care, but honestly I think the issue of where Cruz was born will mainly be brought up by Democrats looking for payback, and primary opponents of his if he's polling better than they are.
A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.

Albert Einstein
User avatar
The dane
Congressman
 
Posts: 799
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:07 pm
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 94 times
Political Leaning: Very Liberal

Re: When Birtherism Boomerangs

Postby Indy » Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:05 am

I highly doubt they'll even go there.

1) He's a bozo who will never make it through the primaries
2) Nobody really cares about stuff like this

Which is why it was so odd the first time around... although as you point out it was never about that.
User avatar
Indy
VIP
VIP
 
Posts: 8547
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:46 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 289 times
Political Leaning: Libertarian Socialist

Re: When Birtherism Boomerangs

Postby Professor » Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:24 am

I still think that Congress should institute a rigid test for meeting the qualifications to run for President. For every other elected office in the nation, there are specific laws stating how a person should prove that they meet the criteria. You have to have owned a house in the district for X years, proven by mortgage deeds, utility bills, etc. Must be a resident of the state and pay taxes there. Things like that.

But, there is no set-in-stone standard for proving that you are qualified to run for President. Like I've said, I have no doubts that Obama is legit. But, it highlights a problem. To qualify to be on the ballot in a state, a Presidential candidate should have to file, within that state, proof of birth. This would prove both the age and the citizenship requirement set forth in the Constitution.

To the best of my knowledge, that specific Constitutional requirement is the only one that has no Federal laws backing it up and clarifying it. There are numerous laws clarifying freedom of speech, voting rights, separation of powers, etc. And, that's the way that the Constitution is supposed to work. It outlines basic guidelines. But, it's not specific enough to be a law unto itself. The ideas in the Constitution are meant to be clarified and codified. But, there is not a single law clarifying what is a citizen, and what is needed to prove such.
Image
User avatar
Professor
VIP
VIP
 
Posts: 7553
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:42 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA
Gender: Male
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 570 times
Political Leaning: Rockefeller Republican

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron