Re: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 9:09 am
Political Crossfire Forums
Political forum discussions also covering current events, constitutional rights, and more!
https://political-crossfire.com/
that's not drunk driving
Page 16 of 17
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 9:09 amRe: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 9:11 amThat's so wrong it's right.
Re: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 9:16 amRe: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 9:23 amRe: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 9:53 amI can be selective in my chaos.
The thing about chaos... it's fair...
Love the pic, though. LOL.
The thing about chaos... it's fair...
Love the pic, though. LOL.
Re: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 10:00 amRe: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 10:18 am
Re: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 10:25 amRe: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 10:29 amLMAO.
Re: that's not drunk driving
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 11:35 pm[quote="John Galt"]drunk driving is bad
not drunk driving and calling it Texas dwi classes makes a mockery of it.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/14/us/ntsb-b ... ?hpt=hp_t2
http://www.duilawcenter.org/state/texas/dwi-classes.php
they are recommending changing the standard to 0.05 BAC using their blackmail scheme of forcing states into doing what the feds want. i don't know if 0.08 should even be considered drunk (before MADD came around it was 0.15) but 0.05 certainly is not drunk driving. in my opinion, it should be left to officer discretion, and the BAC noted so that the officer wasn't just making shit up (it's all taped anyway these days)
a much more dangerous activity that happens when driving these days is f**k with phones. but we're busy making sure people who are not even drunk are arrested and marked with a drunk driving arrest. and then the states can't let reason prevail because of the congressional blackmail. lets hope this is not changed to 0.05[/quote]
Hello John,
I also thought reducing it to 0.05.
not drunk driving and calling it Texas dwi classes makes a mockery of it.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/14/us/ntsb-b ... ?hpt=hp_t2
http://www.duilawcenter.org/state/texas/dwi-classes.php
they are recommending changing the standard to 0.05 BAC using their blackmail scheme of forcing states into doing what the feds want. i don't know if 0.08 should even be considered drunk (before MADD came around it was 0.15) but 0.05 certainly is not drunk driving. in my opinion, it should be left to officer discretion, and the BAC noted so that the officer wasn't just making shit up (it's all taped anyway these days)
a much more dangerous activity that happens when driving these days is f**k with phones. but we're busy making sure people who are not even drunk are arrested and marked with a drunk driving arrest. and then the states can't let reason prevail because of the congressional blackmail. lets hope this is not changed to 0.05[/quote]
Hello John,
I also thought reducing it to 0.05.