Political Crossfire Forums

Again, someone disagrees with one aspect of your argument (in this case, the plausibility of political equality), so you immediately assign all sorts of bullshit to them while utterly failing to address their points.

It's getting old, and is typical ideologue behaviour.

I don't support some aspects of capitalism, I don't support some aspects of socialism, and I despise anyone who attempts to pigeonhole the species into a nice little worldview that will solve all our problems. It is just an attempt to favour one brand of mediocrity over another, and should be held in contempt by people of intelligence.

but you're doing literally the exact same thing as dharma only you prefer a multiplicity of ideas instead of one, but in the end your conglomeration is still a nice, tidy, worldview to fix humanity.

I fail to see how an open ended vision for a free society is in anyway assigning any particular political vision to humanity.

And political equality is exactly as realizable as political inequality is. In fact I would say it is a good deal more difficult to maintain a political situation that is inequitable than one that is fair and that all involved agree with. .

The world isn't broken, that's a religious idea.We just don't fully understand how the world works because ideas like this keep getting in the way.