I voted for "well off". Why? Well, despite the OP assertion that he meant "middle class in repressive society or poor in a free one", I think you have to do opposites. The opposite of poor is not middle class, it's rich. So, I assumed rich.
So, the question becomes would you rather be poor (homeless and hungry) in America, or rich (mansion, power, parties with bureaucrats) in China/USSR/North Korea? Given that the rich don't have to play by the same rules as everyone else (this concept is true, regardless of the country), then I'd much rather be rich in a society that oppresses everyone else.
economically well-off or free?
Re: economically well-off or free?
by Mathurin » Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:54 am
Last edited by Mathurin on Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Mathurin
- Congressman
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:58 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Political Leaning: Slightly Conservative
Re: economically well-off or free?
by eynon81 » Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:28 pm
Can i point out that being poor in a free-society often leads to prison of some kind.
-
eynon81 - VIP
- Posts: 19475
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:38 am
- Location: Golden, Colorado
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3875 times
- Been thanked: 1821 times
- Political Leaning: Very Conservative
Re: economically well-off or free?
by PoS » Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:28 pm
To be well off in some totalitarian state usually means youre rich rather than middle class because the mid class is almost nonexistent or they have to scrounge to get by which means they would be considered poor in the 1st world.
-
PoS - Governor
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:50 pm
- Location: Oceania
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 495 times
- Been thanked: 309 times
- Political Leaning: Fascist Libertarian
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests