Re: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:52 pmno it isn't. human defines one species; us.
biological descriptors tend to do that.
or do you still call lizards and birds dinosaurs?
Political Crossfire Forums
Political forum discussions also covering current events, constitutional rights, and more!
https://political-crossfire.com/
resurrection of the neanderthal
Page 8 of 10
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:52 pmRe: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:55 pmRe: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:57 pmRe: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:05 pmThe definition of a dinosaur has changed with new knowledge. Why shouldn't "human?"
Re: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:09 pmRe: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:23 pmRe: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:36 pmhomo is a group classification(genus), human almost universally refers to homo sapien with some controversy if that includes neanderthals. unless one is translating homo into human for the sake of convenience. aside from that brief wiki description i've never seen any ancestral human referred to as human, only by their sub-species name (homo-whateverus)
Re: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:51 pmGoogle "Human Evolution" and sort by books.
Re: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:00 pmThe're alive now, and working in Washington.
Re: resurrection of the neanderthal
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:05 pmThey're the same species as us because we can interbreed. Legally the kid would the a normal child of the mother and that is who would probably have custody.
I think they should totally do it.
I think they should totally do it.