Plus, with the Lumia if you want a camera grip or to use a tripod you have to pay $79 for the attachment. I can just mount mine on the tripod I already have. If you are taking photos of real estate you need a tripod so that would have been an issue for me as well.
Overall I think the Lumia is probably the better snapshot camera but the Samsung lets you use advanced camera settings etc so it's more useful for my purposes, which is professional marketing use.
Samsung Galaxy Camera
13 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Samsung Galaxy Camera
by The Dharma Bum » Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:35 am
-
The Dharma Bum - Vice President
- Posts: 11594
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:31 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3285 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: Samsung Galaxy Camera
by The Dharma Bum » Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:46 am
-
The Dharma Bum - Vice President
- Posts: 11594
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:31 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3285 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: Samsung Galaxy Camera
by eric » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:32 am
Well it depends. If you're talking about the actual camera itself, and not the interface, then it appears that it does blow it out of the water.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
-
eric - Governor
- Posts: 4008
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:27 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 128 times
- Been thanked: 271 times
13 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests