International Rights

[Ace30]

If I was president of the USA during a Gun ban that I was lucky enough to be the champion of... and Canada started smuggling guns into the USA...
First of all, that is act of war, and this simply isn't the days of tight collars, lead makeup and basket shaped dresses, wooden sailing ships and elevator music, housewives, 15 siblings, Irish pubs, horse races, pieces of eight, and cannons and muskets.

The USA is simply the be all, and end all.
Period.
Britain is still the 2 in the world, but that's not a close call.... that's by a long shot, exponentially, and it cannot save Canada or anybody else.
Trust me on that.
That's the way of the world in the 20th and 21st century.


Secondly... After I'm done with ya... I'd take you international court.
For violating America's legislative rights.

[exploited]

A sock or a fifteen year old. Either way, amusing.

[Ace30]

[Ace30]

Britain had its day, and its opportunity but decided to our ally instead... then declined in power by comparison to the USA while the much younger USA just grew.

[exploited]

[spacemonkey]

The Obama administration is running guns and engaged in human trafficking. So what else is new?

[IndependentProfessor]

Meh, when you talk about "international", all rules go out the window. The only ways that one country can "make" another do something (pay money, perform an action, etc.) is if:

1) The other country agrees to do that thing.
2) The first country forces (physically or otherwise) the other country to capitulate.

Realistically, who is going to "force" the US to do something we don't want to do? We're usually the country holding the stick and smacking other people with it (for good or bad).

[NAB]