(shrug)
1. I used the literal text-book definition for a nation-state.
2. my definition includes clearly legitimate governments like China.
go be Neo-con somewhere else.
Does the Second Amendment really have a purpose anymore?
Re: Does the Second Amendment really have a purpose anymore?
by spacemonkey » Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:33 am
The hardest part of doing nothing is knowing when your done.
- spacemonkey
- Governor
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:54 am
- Location: cyberspace
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 73 times
- Been thanked: 296 times
Re: Does the Second Amendment really have a purpose anymore?
by eynon81 » Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:22 pm
- These users thanked the author eynon81 for the post:
- The Dharma Bum
-
eynon81 - VIP
- Posts: 19475
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:38 am
- Location: Golden, Colorado
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3875 times
- Been thanked: 1821 times
- Political Leaning: Very Conservative
Re: Does the Second Amendment really have a purpose anymore?
by exploited » Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:25 pm
That doesn't even make a lick of sense. Why would you use a definition for another word to define legitimacy?
-
exploited - Vice President
- Posts: 23035
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 1837 times
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests